Change of Theme
Just to faciliate a shorter url http://justanalysis.blogspot.com and a theme of providing analysis in every article, whether it makes sense or not is on the reader, I am changing the blog address.
I hope to see more people, especially till the time funemployment is still around.
Economic Survey 2008-09 and Union Budget 2009-10
Recently, two of the most important documents in the economy came out - Economic Survey (ES) for 2008-09 and Union Budget for 2009-10. The post talks about the findings of the ES and the action taken in the Budget on lines of these findings. Also I attempt to highlight what are the results that could be expected out of budgetary actions. Some of the results/interpretations are taken from Economic Times and Business Standard.
S. No. | Economic Survey 2008-09 findings | Union Budget 2009-10 actions | Result |
|
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
Increase in Govt. Expenditure |
|
| |
Sale of Govt. stake in Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) |
|
| |
Telecom:
|
|
| |
Implement the goods and services tax (GST) |
|
| |
Linking interest rates on post office savings schemes with yields on government bonds or bank deposit rates |
| ||
Foreign Direct Investment increase in
|
|
| |
Entry of foreign and rated domestic institutions to provide higher education |
|
| |
Decontrol sugar and fertilizer industry by converting producer subsidies to consumer subsidies |
|
| |
Drug price control limited to drugs which have > 5 producers |
|
| |
New bankruptcy law |
|
| |
Market-determined fuel prices |
|
|
I am still struggling to find out what economic indicators should one watch to have an idea where the economy is right now on the growth trajectory, so cannot comment on whether this budget is growth-friendly or consolidation-targeted. But still the kind of provisions for infrastructure development and employment generation clearly indicate the efforts on part of FM to re-ignite the growth engine.
Any suggestions/comments on the above are most welcomed at sabharwal. sunny@ yahoo.com.
POWER SECTOR
Why power sector?
- My understanding –
- Still cities like Delhi are falling short of power supplies. With growing urbanization, more requirement should be noticed in times to come.
- With concepts like SEZs coming up in all major cities and government's push to infrastructure sector, demand for power is bound to increase manifold.
- Interest of foreign funds in our nuclear power sector also highlights importance of the sector.
- Still cities like Delhi are falling short of power supplies. With growing urbanization, more requirement should be noticed in times to come.
- Facts –
- According to a report by KPMG and CII, India's energy sector will require an investment of around US$ 120 billion-US$ 150 billion over the next five years. (Source: IBEF)
- A recent study by consultancy major McKinsey estimates India's power demand to increase from the present 120 gigawatt (GW) to 315 GW–335 GW by 2017, if India continues to grow at an average of 8 per cent over the next 10 years. This would require a five- to ten-fold rise in power production, entailing investments worth US$ 600 billion over the next ten years. (Source: IBEF)
- So far this year, 11 Indian companies have raised a combined $2.6 billion in equity, and three dozen more, including GVK Power, are looking to raise nearly $10 billion, according to Thomson Reuters data. (Source: Power sector to drive India capital raising | Reuters.com)
- According to a report by KPMG and CII, India's energy sector will require an investment of around US$ 120 billion-US$ 150 billion over the next five years. (Source: IBEF)
Which companies have been analysed?
Stocks having following traits:
- Listed for more than 3 years.
- Positive cash flows for more than 3 years
- Below average industry P/BV ratio
Parameters for comparison
Ratio | Industry Average* FY 2008 | Median* FY 2008 |
Long Term Debt-Equity Ratio | 0.52 | 0.45 |
Current Ratio | 1.97 | 1.75 |
Interest Cover Ratio | 21.27 | 4.16 |
PBIDTM (%) | 74.59 | 43.08 |
ROCE (%) | 9.27 | 8.37 |
PAT Growth | 131% | 30% |
* Data for following companies included Indowind, Reliance Infrastructure, Energy Development, Powergrid, TATA Power, NTPC, GVK, KSK Energy Vent, JaiprakashHydro, Entegra, NEPC, Torrent Power.
Companies worth investing
Ratio | Mar 2008 | Mar 2007 | Mar 2006 | Mar 2005 | Mar 2004 | Remarks | |
Indowind | |||||||
Long Term Debt-Equity Ratio | 0.69 | 0.14 | 0.19 | 0.15 | 0.09 | Average debt levels vis-à-vis industry | |
Current Ratio | 5.46 | 3.42 | 8.27 | 3.11 | 1.99 | very strong liquidity | |
Interest Cover Ratio | 3.76 | 2.8 | 2.64 | 2.59 | 2.43 | Average | |
PBIDTM (%) | 49.39 | 47.03 | 43.16 | 52.44 | 14.96 | Average | |
ROCE (%) | 6.34 | 14.24 | 15.73 | 18.18 | 11.47 | Below Average | |
PAT Growth | 9% | 19% | 33% | 34% | Concern over falling growth rate | ||
Energy Development | |||||||
Long Term Debt-Equity Ratio | 0 | 0.18 | 0.6 | 0.91 | 1.09 | very strong solvency with almost zero debt | |
Current Ratio | 1.23 | 1.35 | 2.55 | 27.62 | 18.5 | concern on liquidity | |
Interest Cover Ratio | 49.84 | 75.65 | 7.11 | 2.62 | 1.34 | Strong | |
PBIDTM (%) | 36.78 | 24.85 | 90.6 | 88.24 | 80.25 | Volatile and average growth | |
ROCE (%) | 25.61 | 19.13 | 14.88 | 13.42 | 9.67 | Constantly rising and above average return | |
PAT Growth | 80% | 121% | 25% | 240% | Volatile but above average growth | ||
rELIANCE INFRASTRUCTURE | |||||||
Long Term Debt-Equity Ratio | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.5 | 0.54 | 0.39 | Average | |
Current Ratio | 2.41 | 2.95 | 2.64 | 2.23 | 1.47 | Strong | |
Interest Cover Ratio | 4.73 | 4.48 | 5.07 | 4.8 | 6.97 | Average | |
PBIDTM (%) | 27.36 | 23.62 | 33.42 | 23.92 | 22.96 | Below Average | |
ROCE (%) | 9.8 | 8.69 | 9.68 | 8.52 | 10.13 | Average | |
PAT Growth | 35% | 23% | 25% | 42% | Above Average |